POVZETEK
Avtorica obravnava vprašanje, ali koncesionar odgovarja za kazniva dejanja, ki jih lahko izvršijo le uradne osebe v smislu 4. točke prvega odstavka 99. člena Kazenskega zakonika (KZ-1). Predstavi sodno prakso v zvezi z uradno osebo in uradnim dejanjem ter naravo koncesije in mehanizem podelitve javnega pooblastila. Izpostavi problematiko razmejevanja strokovnih od oblastvenih nalog pri nepravih uradnih osebah in kot bistveno za odgovor na postavljeno vprašanje napoti na vsebino koncesije. Ker opravljanje javne službe ne zahteva nujno podelitve javnega pooblastila, je pri presoji, ali koncesionar izvaja oblastveno funkcijo državne uprave v pomoč osredotočanje na vprašanja pristojnosti, vnaprej predpisanega postopka izvajanja nalog ter izdajanja uradnih listin.
SUMMARY
The author discusses the question of whether the concessionaire is responsible for criminal offences that can only be committed by an official person within the meaning of point 4 of Article 99(1) of the Slovenian Criminal Code. She presents the case-law concerning the terms official and official act and presents the nature of concession and the mechanism for granting public authority. She emphasises the issue of delimitation of professional and authoritative tasks in the case of non-standard officials and, as essential for the answer to the question posed, refers to the content of the concession. As the performance of a public service does not necessarily require the granting of a public authorisation, whether the concessionaire exercises the authority of the state administration it is helpful to focus on issues of competence procedure and official documents.
TITLE
Is the Concessionaire an Official Person?
Za ogled celotnega dokumenta je potrebna prijava v portal.
Začnite z najboljšim.
VSE NA ENEM MESTU.