2. člen Uredba o ratifikaciji Dodatnega protokola št. 1...

2. člen

Protokol se v izvirniku v slovenskem in angleškem jeziku glasi:*

DODATNI PROTOKOL ŠT. 1 <BR>K SPORAZUMU O PROSTI TRGOVINI     MED REPUBLIKO SLOVENIJO     IN REPUBLIKO LITVO O SPREMEMBAH     PROTOKOLA 3 O PRAVILIH O POREKLU BLAGA

Republika Slovenija in Republika Litva (v nadaljevanju pogodbenici) sta,

ob upoštevanju sporazuma o prosti trgovini med Republiko Slovenijo in Republiko Litvo, podpisanega v Vilniusu dne 4. oktobra 1996 in protokola 3 k temu sporazumu v zvezi s pravili o poreklu blaga in v zvezi z definicijo pojma »izdelki s poreklom« in načinih upravnega sodelovanja;

ker je v okviru protokola 3 treba spremeniti definicijo pojma »izdelki s poreklom«, da bi se zagotovilo pravilno delovanje razširjenega sistema kumulacije, ki dovoljuje uporabo materialov s poreklom iz Evropske skupnosti, Republike Poljske, Republike Madžarske, Češke republike, Slovaške republike, Republike Bolgarije, Romunije, Republike Latvije, Republike Estonije, Republike Litve, Republike Slovenije, Islandije, Norveške in Švice (vključno z Liechtensteinom);

ker se zdi priporočljivo ohraniti v uporabi do 31. decembra 2000 sistem dajatev po enotni tarifi, kot je to zagotovljeno v 15. členu protokola v zvezi s prepovedjo povračila carine ali opustitve plačila carine;

ker je primerno razširiti sistem kumulacije na take izdelke s porekom iz Turčije;

ker je zaradi lajšanja in poenostavitve upravnih nalog zaželeno spremeniti besedilo 3., 4. in 12. člena protokola 3;

ker je, ob upoštevanju sprememb postopkov predelave in pomanjkanja določenih surovin, treba popraviti seznam zahtevanih obdelav ali predelav, ki jih je treba izpolniti za materiale brez porekla, da bi lahko pridobili status blaga s poreklom,

SKLENILI KOT SLEDI:

1. člen

Protokol 3 v zvezi z definicijo pojma »izdelki s poreklom« in načinih upravnega sodelovanja se spremeni in dopolni v naslednjem:

1. Točka i) 1. člena se nadomesti z:

“i) ‘dodana vrednost’ pomeni ceno izdelka franko tovarna, zmanjšano za carinsko vrednost vsakega od vključenih materialov s poreklom iz drugih držav, omenjenih v 3. in 4. členu, ali, če carinska vrednost ni znana ali se ne da ugotoviti, prva cena, ki se za izdelke dokazljivo plačuje v Sloveniji ali Litvi.”

2. 3. in 4. člen se nadomestita z naslednjimi:

3. člen

Kumulacija v Sloveniji

1. Ne glede na določbe prvega odstavka 2. člena izdelki veljajo za izdelke s poreklom iz Slovenije, če so bili tam pridobljeni in vključujejo materiale s poreklom iz Litve, Slovenije, Evropske skupnosti, Bolgarije, Poljske, Madžarske, Češke republike, Slovaške republike, Romunije, Latvije, Estonije, Islandije, Norveške, Švice (vključno z Liechtensteinom)1 ali Turčije, v skladu z določbami Protokola o pravilih o poreklu, priloženega k sporazumom med Slovenijo in vsako od teh držav, pod pogojem, da obdelava ali predelava, opravljena v Sloveniji presega tisto, omenjeno v 7. členu tega Protokola. Ni treba, da bi bili taki materiali zadosti obdelani ali predelani.

2. Če obdelava ali predelava, ki se opravlja v Sloveniji, ne presega postopkov, omenjenih v 7. členu, se šteje, da ima pridobljeni izdelek poreklo iz Slovenije samo, kadar je tam dodana vrednost višja od vrednosti uporabljenih materialov s poreklom iz katerekoli od držav, omenjenih v prvem odstavku. Če to ni tako, se pridobljeni izdelek šteje za izdelek s poreklom iz države, ki je prispevala največjo vrednost uporabljenih materialov s poreklom pri proizvodnji v Sloveniji.

3. Izdelki s poreklom iz ene od držav, omenjenih v prvem odstavku, ki niso obdelani ali predelani v Sloveniji, ohranijo svoje poreklo, če se izvozijo v eno od teh držav.

4. V tem členu predvidena kumulacija se lahko uporablja samo za materiale in izdelke, ki so pridobili status blaga s poreklom z uporabo pravil o poreklu, ki so enaka kot pravila v tem Protokolu.

4. člen

Kumulacija v Litvi

1. Ne glede na določbe drugega odstavka 2. člena izdelki veljajo za izdelke s poreklom iz Litve, če so bili tam pridobljeni in vključujejo materiale s poreklom iz Slovenije, Litve, Evropske skupnosti, Bolgarije, Poljske, Madžarske, Češke republike, Slovaške republike, Romunije, Latvije, Estonije, Islandije, Norveške, Švice (vključno z Liechtensteinom)2 ali Turčije, v skladu z določbami Protokola o pravilih o poreklu, priloženega k sporazumom med Litvo in vsako od teh držav, pod pogojem, da obdelava ali predelava, opravljena v Litvi presega tisto, omenjeno v 7. členu tega Protokola. Ni treba, da bi bili taki materiali zadosti obdelani ali predelani.

2. Če obdelava ali predelava, ki se opravlja v Litvi, ne presega postopkov, omenjenih v 7. členu, se šteje, da ima pridobljeni izdelek poreklo iz Litve samo, kadar je tam dodana vrednost višja od vrednosti uporabljenih materialov s poreklom iz katerekoli od držav, omenjenih v prvem odstavku. Če to ni tako, se pridobljeni izdelek šteje za izdelek s poreklom iz države, ki je prispevala največjo vrednost uporabljenih materialov s poreklom pri proizvodnji v Litvi.

3. Izdelki s poreklom iz ene od držav, omenjenih v prvem odstavku, ki niso obdelani ali predelani v Litvi, ohranijo svoje poreklo, če se izvozijo v eno od teh držav.

4. V tem členu predvidena kumulacija se lahko uporablja samo za materiale in izdelke, ki so pridobili status blaga s poreklom z uporabo pravil o poreklu, ki so enaka kot pravila v tem Protokolu.«

3. 12. člen se nadomesti z naslednjim:

“1. Razen v primerih iz 3. in 4. člena in tretjega odstavka tega člena, morajo biti pogoji za pridobitev statusa blaga s poreklom, določeni v II. oddelku, v Sloveniji ali Litvi izpolnjeni neprekinjeno.

2. Razen v primerih iz 3. in 4. člena, se blago s poreklom, izvoženo iz Slovenije ali Litve v drugo državo, ko se vrne, šteje za blago brez porekla, razen če se carinskim organom lahko zadovoljivo dokaže:

(a) da je blago, ki se vrača, isto blago, kot je bilo izvoženo, in

(b) da na njem, medtem ko je bilo v tisti državi ali med izvozom, niso bili opravljeni nikakršni postopki, razen tistih, ki so potrebni, da se ohrani v dobrem stanju.

3. Na pridobitev statusa blaga s poreklom v skladu s pogoji, določenimi v II. oddelku, ne bo vplivala obdelava ali predelava, opravljena izven Slovenije ali Litve na materialih, izvoženih iz Slovenije ali Litve in ponovno tam uvoženih pod pogojem, da:

(a) so omenjeni materiali v celoti pridobljeni v Sloveniji ali Litvi ali so pred njihovim izvozom bili obdelani ali predelani bolj, kot so nezadostni postopki, navedeni v 7. členu; in

(b) se carinskim organom zadovoljivo dokaže, da:

je bilo ponovno uvoženo blago pridobljeno z obdelavo ali predelavo izvoženih materialov; in

ii)

skupna dodana vrednost, pridobljena izven Slovenije ali Litve ob uporabi določb tega člena ne presega 10 odstotkov cene franko tovarna končnega izdelka, za katerega se ugotavlja status blaga s poreklom.

4. Za namene tretjega odstavka se pogoji za pridobitev statusa blaga s poreklom, določeni v II. oddelku, ne uporabljajo za obdelavo ali predelavo, opravljeno izven Slovenije ali Litve. Vendar, kjer se v seznamu v Prilogi II za določitev statusa blaga s poreklom za končni izdelek uporablja pravilo, ki določa najvišjo vrednost vseh vključenih materialov brez porekla, skupna vrednost materialov brez porekla, vključenih na ozemlju določene pogodbenice, upoštevana skupaj s skupno dodano vrednostjo, pridobljeno izven Slovenije ali Litve z uporabo določb tega člena, ne sme presegati navedenega odstotka.

5. Za namene uporabe določb tretjega in četrtega odstavka se šteje, da “skupna dodana vrednost” pomeni vse stroške, nastale izven Slovenije ali Litve, vključno vrednosti tam vključenih materialov.

6. Določbe tretjega in četrtega odstavka se ne uporabljajo za izdelke, ki ne izpolnjujejo pogojev, določenih v seznamu Priloge II in ki se lahko štejejo za zadosti obdelane ali predelane samo ob uporabi splošne tolerance, določene v drugem odstavku 6. člena.

7. Določbe tretjega in četrtega odstavka ne veljajo za izdelke, ki se uvrščajo v 50. do 63. poglavje Harmoniziranega sistema.

8. Vsaka obdelava ali predelava, ki je zajeta z določbami tega člena, opravljena izven Slovenije ali Litve, se opravi v skladu s postopki o začasnem izvozu na oplemenitenje ali podobnimi postopki.«

4. V 13., 14., 15., 17., 21., 27., 30. in 32. členu se besedilo “omenjeno v 4. členu” nadomesti z “omenjeno v 3. in 4. členu”.

5. V zadnjem pododstavku šestega odstavka 15. člena se datum “31.december 1998” nadomesti z “31. december 2000”.

6. V prvem odstavku 26. člena se sklicevanje na “C2/CP3” nadomesti z “CN22/CN23”.

7. V Prilogi I, opomba 5.2:

(a) se med navedbami:

“-umetni filamenti” in

“-sintetična rezana vlakna iz polipropilena”

vstavi naslednje:

“-prevodni filamenti”.

(b) peti primer (“Taftana preproga,……pogoj glede teže.”) se črta.

8. Priloga II se spremeni in dopolni kot sledi.

(a) med zapise za tarifni številki 2202 in 2208 HS se vstavi naslednje:

&fbco;binary entityId="a13705489-deef-4f6f-8afd-afbbc068b718" type="jpg"&fbcc;

(b) zapis za 57. poglavje se nadomesti z:

&fbco;binary entityId="a2db16fa0-5905-497b-8641-8869cd508e8e" type="jpg"&fbcc;

(1)

Posebni pogoji, ki veljajo za proizvode iz mešanice tekstilnih materialov, so navedeni v Uvodni opombi 5.

(a) Uporaba preje iz jute je dovoljena od 1. 7. 2000.

&fbco;binary entityId="a673a9820-9dc2-456d-8603-118e18d66730" type="jpg"&fbcc;

2 SEMII – Registrirani inštitut za polprevodniško opremo in materiale.

(d) pravilo za tarifno številko 7601 HS se nadomesti z:

&fbco;binary entityId="af323e9b0-3449-4253-ac88-612235eeffe4" type="jpg"&fbcc;

9. V Prilogi IV se besedilo slovenske inačice izjave na računu nadomesti z besedilom, ki se glasi:

“ Izvoznik blaga, zajetega s tem dokumentom (pooblastilo carinskih organov št….(1b)) izjavlja, da, razen če ni drugače jasno navedeno, ima to blago preferencialno…(2b) poreklo.”

2. člen

Ta Dodatni protokol št.1 začne veljati 15 dni po zadnjem uradnem obvestilu pogodbenice o tem, da so zaključeni notranjepravni postopki v zvezi z uveljavitvijo Dodatnega protokola.

Ta Dodatni protokol št. 1 se začasno uporablja od 1. aprila 1999.

V potrditev tega so podpisani pooblaščenci, v ta namen pravilno pooblaščeni, podpisali ta Dodatni protokol.

Sestavljeno v Vilniusu, 18. februarja tisočdevetstodevetindevetdesetega leta v dvojniku v slovenskem, litvanskem in angleškem jeziku, pri čemer je vsako od teh besedil enako verodostojno. V primeru razlik prevlada angleško besedilo.

Za Republiko Slovenijo Metod Dragonja l. r.

Za Republiko Litvo Algirdas Saudargas l. r

1 Kneževina Liechtenstein ima carinsko unijo s Švico in je pogodbenica Sporazuma o evropskem gospodarskem prostoru .

2 Kneževina Liechtenstein ima carinsko unijo s Švico in je pogodbenica Sporazuma o evropskem gospodarskem prostoru.

ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL No. 1 <BR>TO THE FREE TRADE AGREEMENT     BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA     AND THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA     ON AMENDMENTS TO THE PROTOCOL 3     ON RULES OF ORIGIN

The Republic of Slovenia and the Republic of Lithuania (hereinafter called the Parties),
    Having regard to the Free Trade Agreement between the Republic of Slovenia and the Republic of Lithuania, signed in Vilnius on 4 October 1996 and Protocol 3 to this Agreement concerning the rules of origin of goods and the definition of the concept of “originating products” and methods of administrative co-operation;
    Whereas within the Protocol 3 the definition of the term “originating products” needs to be amended to ensure the proper operation of the extended system of cumulation which permits the use of materials originating in the European Community, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Hungary, the Czech Republic, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Bulgaria, Romania, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Slovenia, Iceland, Norway and Switzerland (including Liechtenstein);
    Whereas it would seem advisable to maintain in operation by 31 December 2000 the system of flat rate charges provided for in Article 15 of Protocol 3 in connection with the prohibition of drawback and exemption from customs duty;
    Whereas it would also be appropriate to extend the cumulation system to such products originating in the Republic of Turkey;
    Whereas to facilitate and simplify administrative tasks it would be desirable to amend the wording of Articles 3, 4 and 12 of Protocol 3;
    Whereas taking into account of changes in processing techniques and shortages of certain raw materials, some corrections must be made to the list of working and processing requirements which non-originating materials have to fulfil to qualify for originating status;
    HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Protocol 3 concerning the definition of the concept of “originating products” and methods of administrative cooperation is hereby amended as follows:
1. Article 1(i) shall be replaced by:

“ (i) “added value” shall be taken to be the ex-works price minus the customs value of each of the materials incorporated which originate in the other countries referred to in Articles 3 and 4 or, where the customs value is not known or cannot be ascertained, the first price verifiably paid for the products in Slovenia or Lithuania.”

2. Articles 3 and 4 shall be replaced by the following:

“Article 3

Cumulation in Slovenia

1. Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 2(1), products shall be considered as originating in Slovenia if such products are obtained there, incorporating materials originating in the European Community, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Hungary, the Czech Republic, the Slovak Republic, Romania, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Slovenia, Iceland, Norway, Switzerland (including Liechtenstein)1 or the Republic of Turkey, in accordance with the provisions of the Protocol on rules of origin annexed to the Agreements between Slovenia and each of these countries, provided that the working or processing carried out in Slovenia goes beyond that referred to in Article 7 of this Protocol. It shall not be necessary that such materials have undergone sufficient working or processing.
    2. Where the working or processing carried out in Slovenia does not go beyond the operations referred to in Article 7, the product obtained shall be considered as originating in Slovenia only where the value added there is greater than the value of the materials used originating in any one of the other countries referred to in paragraph 1. If this is not so, the product obtained shall be considered as originating in the country which accounts for the highest value of originating materials used in the manufacture in Slovenia.
    3. Products, originating in one of the countries referred to in paragraph 1, which do not undergo any working or processing in Slovenia, retain their origin if exported into one of these countries.
    4. The cumulation provided for in this Article may only be applied to materials and products which have acquired originating status by an application of rules of origin identical to those given in this Protocol.

Article 4

Cumulation in Lithuania

1. Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 2(2), products shall be considered as originating in Lithuania if such products are obtained there, incorporating materials originating in the European Community, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Hungary, the Czech Republic, the Slovak Republic, Romania, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Slovenia, Iceland, Norway, Switzerland (including Liechtenstein)2 or the Republic of Turkey in accordance with the provisions of the Protocol on rules of origin annexed to the Agreements between Lithuania and each of these countries, provided that the working or processing carried out in Lithuania goes beyond that referred to in Article 7 of this Protocol. It shall not be necessary that such materials have undergone sufficient working or processing.
    2. Where the working or processing carried out in Lithuania does not go beyond the operations referred to in Article 7, the product obtained shall be considered as originating in Lithuania only where the value added there is greater than the value of the materials used originating in any one of the other countries referred to in paragraph 1. If this is not so, the product obtained shall be considered as originating in the country which accounts for the highest value of originating materials used in the manufacture in Lithuania.
    3. Products, originating in one of the countries referred to in paragraph 1, which do not undergo any working or processing in Lithuania, retain their origin if exported into one of these countries.
    4. The cumulation provided for in this Article may only be applied to materials and products which have acquired originating status by an application of rules of origin identical to those given in this Protocol.”
    3. Article 12 shall be replaced by the following:

“1. Except as provided for in Articles 3 and 4 and paragraph 3 of this Article, the conditions for acquiring originating status set out in Title II must continue to be fulfilled at all times in Slovenia or Lithuania.

2. Except as provided for in Articles 3 and 4, where originating goods exported from Slovenia or Lithuania to another country return, they must be considered as non-originating, unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the customs authorities that:
    (a) the returning goods are the same as those that were exported; and
    (b) they have not undergone any operation beyond that necessary to preserve them in good condition while in that country or while being exported.
    3. The acquisition of originating status in accordance with the conditions set out in Title II shall not be affected by working or processing done outside Slovenia or Lithuania on materials exported from Slovenia or Lithuania and subsequently reimported there, provided:
    (a) the said materials are wholly obtained in Slovenia or Lithuania or have undergone working or processing beyond the insufficient operations listed in Article 7 prior to being exported; and
    (b) it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the customs authorities that:
    i) the reimported goods have been obtained by working or processing the exported materials; and
    ii) the total added value acquired outside Slovenia or Lithuania by applying the provisions of this Article does not exceed 10% of the ex-works price of the end product for which originating status is claimed.
    4. For the purposes of paragraph 3, the conditions for acquiring originating status set out in Title II shall not apply to working or processing done outside Slovenia or Lithuania. But where, in the list in Annex II, a rule setting a maximum value for all the non-originating materials incorporated is applied in determining the originating status of the end product, the total value of the non-originating materials incorporated in the territory of the Party concerned, taken together with the total added value acquired outside Slovenia or Lithuania by applying the provisions of this Article, shall not exceed the stated percentage.
    5. For the purposes of applying the provisions of paragraphs 3 and 4, “total added value” shall be taken to mean all costs arising outside Slovenia or Lithuania, including the value of the materials incorporated there.
    6. The provisions of paragraphs 3 and 4 shall not apply to products which do not fulfil the conditions set out in the list in Annex II or which can be considered sufficiently worked or processed only if the general values fixed in Article 6(2) are applied.
    7. The provisions of paragraphs 3 and 4 shall not apply to products coming under Chapters 50 to 63 of the Harmonised System.
    8. Any working or processing of the kind covered by the provisions of this Article and done outside Slovenia or Lithuania shall be done under the outward processing arrangements, or similar arrangements.”
    4. In Articles 13, 14, 15, 17, 21, 27, 30 and 32 the phrase “referred to in Article 4” shall be replaced by “referred to in Articles 3 and 4”.
    5. In the last paragraph of Article 15(6) the date “31 December 1998” shall be replaced by “31 December 2000”.
    6. In Article 26(1) the reference “C2/CP3” shall be replaced by “CN22/CN23”.
    7. In Annex I, Note 5.2:
    (a) between the indents “- artificial man-made filaments” and “- synthetic man-made staple fibres of polypropylene” the following shall be inserted:

“– current conducting filaments”;

(b) the fifth example (“A carpet with tufts. .. are met.”) shall be deleted;
8. Annex II shall be amended as follows:
(a) the following shall be inserted between the entries for HS heading Nos 2202 and 2208:

&fbco;binary entityId="a0c94fd04-4b50-4a95-8273-2d408fbe40a2" type="jpg"&fbcc;

(b) the entry for Chapter 57 shall be replaced by:

&fbco;binary entityId="a26a26ede-d573-439d-a671-8e5e0a15a77c" type="jpg"&fbcc;

1 For special conditions relating to products made of a mixture f textile materials, see Introductory Note 5.
(a) The use of jute yarn is authorised from 1.7.2000

&fbco;binary entityId="a88a95330-e315-4c1e-bf80-951c7b89d0b1" type="jpg"&fbcc;

2 SEMII- Semiconductor Equipment and Materials Institute Incorporated.

&fbco;binary entityId="a812cbe69-c135-4af7-82ef-28e9cc628dd6" type="jpg"&fbcc;&fbco;binary entityId="a9a33379f-7e3d-4e64-bfb9-9fa672d64caf" type="jpg"&fbcc;

9. In Annex IV, the Slovenian version of the invoice declaration shall be replaced by the following text:

“Izvoznik blaga, zajetega s tem dokumentom (pooblastilo carinskih organov št….(1b)) izjavlja, da, če ni drugače jasno navedeno, ima to blago preferencialno…(2b) poreklo.”

Article 2

This Additional Protocol No. 1 shall enter into force fifteen days after the last notification of the Party that its internal legal procedures related to entering into force of the Additional Protocol have been completed.
    This Additional Protocol No.1 shall be applied provisionally as of 1 April 1999.
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned plenipotentiaries, being duly authorised thereto, have signed this Additional Protocol.
    DONE at Vilnius, this 18 day of February one thousand nine hundred and ninety nine in duplicate copies in the Slovenian, Lithuanian and English languages, all texts being equally authentic. In case of divergences the English text shall prevail.

On behalf of
    the Republic of Slovenia
    Metod Dragonja, (s)
    On behalf of
    the Republic of Lithuania
    Algirdas Saudargas, (s)

1 The Principality of Liechtenstein has a customs union with Switzerland, and is a Contracting Party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area.

2 The Principality of Liechtenstein has a customs union with Switzerland and is a Contracting Party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area.

Uredba o ratifikaciji Dodatnega protokola št. 1 k Sporazumu o prosti trgovini med Republiko Slovenijo in Republiko Litvo o spremembah protokola 3 o pravilih o poreklu blaga