2. člen BDEIDOD-A

2. člen

Protokol se v izvirniku v slovenskem in angleškem jeziku glasi:(1)

P r o t o k o l <br /> o spremembah Sporazuma z dne 3. maja 2006 med Republiko Slovenijo in Zvezno republiko Nemčijo o izogibanju dvojnega obdavčevanja v zvezi z davki od dohodka in premoženja

Republika Slovenija in Zvezna republika Nemčija

sta se v želji, da skleneta Protokol o spremembah Sporazuma z dne 3. maja 2006 med Republiko Slovenijo in Zvezno republiko Nemčijo o izogibanju dvojnega obdavčevanja v zvezi z davki od dohodka in premoženja,

sporazumeli o naslednjem:

I. člen

26. člen sporazuma se preoblikuje tako, da se glasi:

»26. člen

Izmenjava informacij

(1)

Pristojna organa držav pogodbenic si izmenjujeta informacije, ki so predvidoma pomembne za izvajanje določb tega sporazuma ali za izvajanje ali uveljavljanje domače zakonodaje glede davkov vseh vrst in opisov, ki se uvedejo v imenu držav pogodbenic, dežele ali političnih enot ali lokalnih oblasti države pogodbenice ali dežele, če obdavčevanje na tej podlagi ni v nasprotju s tem sporazumom. Izmenjava informacij ni omejena s 1. in 2. členom.

(2)

Vsaka informacija, ki jo država pogodbenica prejme na podlagi prvega odstavka, se obravnava kot tajnost, enako kakor informacije, pridobljene na podlagi domače zakonodaje te države, in se razkrije samo osebam ali organom (vključno s sodišči in upravnimi organi), udeleženim pri odmeri ali pobiranju, izterjavi ali pregonu ali pri odločanju o pritožbah glede davkov iz prvega odstavka ali pri nadzoru nad omenjenim. Te osebe ali organi uporabljajo informacije samo v te namene. Informacije lahko razkrijejo v sodnih postopkih ali sodnih odločbah. Ne glede na navedene določbe se informacije lahko uporabijo za druge namene, če se po zakonodaji obeh držav smejo uporabiti v te druge namene in pristojni organ države pošiljateljice informacij soglaša s tako uporabo.

(3)

Določbe prvega in drugega odstavka se v nobenem primeru ne razlagajo tako, kakor da državi pogodbenici nalagajo obveznost:

da za pridobitev informacij izvaja upravne ukrepe, ki niso v skladu z zakonodajo in upravno prakso te ali druge države pogodbenice,

da priskrbi informacije, ki jih ni mogoče dobiti po zakonski ali običajni upravni poti te ali druge države pogodbenice,

da priskrbi informacije, ki bi razkrile kakršno koli trgovinsko, poslovno, industrijsko, komercialno ali poklicno skrivnost ali trgovinski postopek, ali informacije, katerih razkritje bi bilo v nasprotju z javnim redom.

(4)

Če država pogodbenica zahteva informacije na podlagi tega člena, druga država pogodbenica sprejme ukrepe za njihovo pridobitev, tudi če jih ta druga država morda ne potrebuje za svoje davčne namene. Za obveznost iz prejšnjega stavka veljajo omejitve iz tretjega odstavka, ki pa se v nobenem primeru ne razlagajo tako, kakor da država pogodbenica lahko zavrne pošiljanje informacij samo zato, ker sama zanje nima interesa pri domačem obdavčevanju.

(5)

V nobenem primeru se določbe tretjega odstavka ne razlagajo tako, kakor da država pogodbenica lahko zavrne pošiljanje informacij samo zato, ker jih hrani banka, druga finančna ustanova, pooblaščenec ali oseba, ki deluje kot zastopnik ali fiduciar, ali zato, ker so povezane z lastniškimi deleži v neki osebi.«

II. člen

Peta točka protokola k sporazumu se preoblikuje tako, da se glasi:

»5.

V zvezi s 26. členom

Če se na podlagi 26. člena pošiljajo osebni podatki, se uporabljajo te dodatne določbe:

Organ prejemnik lahko te podatke v skladu z drugim odstavkom 26. člena uporabi samo za namen, ki ga navede organ pošiljatelj, in pod pogoji, ki jih predpiše organ pošiljatelj.

Organ pošiljatelj mora zagotoviti, da so poslani podatki točni, da so predvidoma pomembni glede na prvi stavek prvega odstavka 26. člena in da so sorazmerni namenu pošiljanja. Podatki so predvidoma pomembni, če v konkretnem primeru obstaja velika možnost, da ima druga država pogodbenica pravico do obdavčitve in nič ne kaže, da so pristojnemu organu druge države pogodbenice podatki že znani ali da bi pristojni organ druge države pogodbenice za predmet obdavčitve zvedel brez teh informacij. Če se izkaže, da so poslani podatki netočni ali da jih ne bi smeli poslati, se organ prejemnik o tem takoj obvesti. Ta organ mora take podatke takoj popraviti ali izbrisati. Če so poslani spontano, organ prejemnik takoj preveri, ali jih potrebuje za namen, za katerega so bili poslani; ta organ takoj izbriše vse podatke, ki jih ne potrebuje.

Organ prejemnik na zahtevo v vsakem primeru posebej obvesti organ pošiljatelja zaradi obveščanja posamezne osebe o uporabi poslanih podatkov in doseženih rezultatih.

Organ prejemnik to osebo obvesti, da organ pošiljatelj o njej zbira podatke. Osebe ni treba obvestiti, če in dokler se šteje, da javni interes, da se osebe ne obvesti, prevlada nad njeno pravico do obveščenosti.

Na zahtevo se ta oseba obvesti o poslanih podatkih v zvezi z njo in o tem, za kaj se bodo taki podatki uporabljali. Pri tem se smiselno uporablja drugi stavek točke d.

Organ prejemnik je na podlagi svoje domače zakonodaje odgovoren vsaki osebi, ki je nezakonito utrpela škodo v zvezi s pošiljanjem podatkov na podlagi izmenjave podatkov skladno s tem sporazumom. Organ prejemnik se v odnosu do oškodovane osebe v svojo obrambo ne more sklicevati na to, da je škodo povzročil organ pošiljatelj.

Organ pošiljatelj in organ prejemnik morata uradno evidentirati pošiljanje in prejem osebnih podatkov.

Poslani osebni podatki se izbrišejo takoj, ko niso več potrebni za namen, za katerega so bili poslani.

Organ pošiljatelj in organ prejemnik morata učinkovito ukrepati, da zavarujeta poslane osebne podatke pred nedovoljenim dostopom, nedovoljenim spreminjanjem in nedovoljenim razkritjem.«

III. člen

(1)

Ta protokol se ratificira in listini o ratifikaciji se izmenjata, kakor hitro je to mogoče, v Berlinu.

(2)

Ta protokol začne veljati na dan izmenjave listin o ratifikaciji in se takoj uporablja v obeh državah pogodbenicah.

Sestavljeno v Ljubljani dne 17. maja 2011 v dveh izvodih, vsak v slovenskem, nemškem in angleškem jeziku, pri čemer so vsa tri besedila verodostojna. Pri različni razlagi nemškega in slovenskega besedila prevlada angleško besedilo.

Za Republiko Slovenijo Mateja Vraničar l.r.
Za Zvezno republiko Nemčijo Werner Burkart l.r.

(1) Besedilo protokola v nemškem jeziku je na vpogled v Sektorju za mednarodno pravo Ministrstva za zunanje zadeve.

P r o t o c o l <br /> amending the Agreement of 3 May 2006 between the Republic of Slovenia and the Federal Republic of Germany for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital

The Republic of Slovenia and The Federal Republic of Germany –

Desiring to conclude a Protocol amending the Agreement of 3 May 2006 between the Republic of Slovenia and the Federal Republic of Germany for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital –

Have agreed as follows:

Article I

Article 26 of the Agreement shall be reformulated as follows:

“Article 26

Exchange of Information

(1) The competent authorities of the Contracting States shall exchange such information as is foreseeably relevant for carrying out the provisions of this Agreement or to the administration or enforcement of the domestic laws concerning taxes of every kind and description imposed on behalf of the Contracting States, of a Land or a political subdivision or local authority of a Contracting State or Land, insofar as the taxation thereunder is not contrary to the Agreement. The exchange of information is not restricted by Articles 1 and 2.

(2) Any information received under paragraph 1 by a Contracting State shall be treated as secret in the same manner as information obtained under the domestic laws of that State and shall be disclosed only to persons or authorities (including courts and administrative bodies) concerned with the assessment or collection of, the enforcement or prosecution in respect of, or with the determination of appeals in relation to the taxes referred to in paragraph 1, or the oversight of the above. Such persons or authorities shall use the information only for such purposes. They may disclose the information in public court proceedings or in judicial decisions. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, the information may be used for other purposes, if under the law of both States it may be used for these other purposes and the competent authority of the supplying State has agreed to this use.

(3) In no case shall the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 be construed so as to impose on a Contracting State the obligation:

a) to carry out administrative measures for the supply of information at variance with the laws and administrative practice of that or of the other Contracting State;

b) to supply information which is not obtainable under the laws or in the normal course of the administration of that or of the other Contracting State;

c) to supply information which would disclose any trade, business, industrial, commercial or professional secret or trade process, or information, the disclosure of which would be contrary to public policy (ordre public).

(4) If information is requested by a Contracting State under this Article, the other Contracting State shall use its information gathering measures to obtain the requested information, even though that other State may not need such information for its own tax purposes. The obligation contained in the preceding sentence is subject to the limitations of paragraph 3, whereby this shall, however, in no case be construed to permit a Contracting State to decline to supply information solely because it has no domestic taxation interest in that information.

(5) In no case shall the provisions of paragraph 3 be construed to permit a Contracting State to decline to supply information solely because the information is held by a bank, other financial institution, nominee or person acting in an agency or a fiduciary capacity or because it relates to ownership interests in a person.”

Article II

Number 5 of the Protocol to the Agreement shall be reformulated as follows:

“5. With reference to Article 26

Insofar as personal data are supplied under Article 26, the following additional provisions shall apply:

a) The receiving agency may use such data in compliance with paragraph 2 of Article 26 only for the purpose stated by the supplying agency and shall be subject to the conditions prescribed by the supplying agency.

b) The supplying agency shall be obliged to ensure that the data to be supplied are accurate and their foreseeable relevance within the meaning of the first sentence of paragraph 1 of Article 26 and that they are proportionate to the purpose for which they are supplied. Data are foreseeably relevant if in the concrete case at hand there is the serious possibility that the other Contracting State has a right to tax and there is nothing to indicate that the data are already known to the competent authority of the other Contracting State or that the competent authority of the other Contracting State would learn of the taxable object without the information. If it emerges that inaccurate data or data which should not have been supplied have been supplied, the receiving agency shall be informed of this without delay. That agency shall be obliged to correct or erase such data without delay. If data have been supplied spontaneously, the receiving agency shall check without delay whether the data are needed for the purpose for which they were supplied; that agency shall immediately erase any data which is not needed.

c) The receiving agency shall on request inform the supplying agency on a case-by-case basis for the purpose of informing the person concerned about the use of the supplied data and the results achieved thereby.

d) The receiving agency shall inform the person concerned of the data collection by the supplying agency. The person concerned need not be informed if and as long as on balance it is considered that the public interest in not informing him outweighs his right to be informed.

e) Upon application the person concerned shall be informed of the supplied data relating to him and of the use to which such data are to be put. The second sentence of paragraph d) shall apply accordingly.

f) The receiving agency shall bear liability under its domestic laws in relation to any person suffering unlawful damage in connection with the supply of data under the exchange of data pursuant to this Agreement. In relation to the damaged person, the receiving agency may not plead to its discharge that the damage had been caused by the supplying agency.

g) The supplying and the receiving agencies shall be obliged to keep official records of the supply and receipt of personal data.

h) The personal data supplied shall be erased as soon as they are no longer required for the purpose for which they were supplied.

i) The supplying and the receiving agencies shall be obliged to take effective measures to protect the personal data supplied against unauthorised access, unauthorised alteration and unauthorised disclosure.”

Article III

(1) This Protocol shall be ratified, and the instruments of ratification shall be exchanged as soon as possible in Berlin.

(2) This Protocol shall enter into force on the day of the exchange of the instruments of ratification and shall have immediate effect in both Contracting States.

Done at Ljubljana on 17 May 2011 in duplicate, each in the Slovenian, German and English languages, all three texts being authentic. In the case of divergent interpretations of the German and Slovenian texts the English text shall prevail.

For the
Republic of Slovenia
Mateja Vraničar (s)
For the
Federal Republic of Germany
Werner Burkart (s)

Zakon o ratifikaciji Protokola o spremembah Sporazuma z dne 3. maja 2006 med Republiko Slovenijo in Zvezno republiko Nemčijo o izogibanju dvojnega obdavčevanja v zvezi z davki od dohodka in premoženja (BDEIDOD-A)