TFL Vsebine / Pravni letopis

Ko govorimo o pravnih posledicah ničnosti pogodbe, imamo v mislih tiste posledice, ki nastanejo neodvisno od namere strank. Najpomembnejše zadevajo vzvratni potek pogodbenega razmerja, da se doseže status quo ante, stanje, kakršno bi bilo, če pogodba sploh ne bi bila sklenjena. K temu pripomorejo kondikcijski zahtevki tiste stranke, ki je že v celoti ali delno izpolnila svojo pogodbeno zavezo. Na tem področju pa je več vprašanj, kot pa je odgovorov. V literaturi obstaja negotovost že o tem, ali velja pri nas vrnitveno ali obogatitveno načelo. Še precej težja vprašanja porajajo večosebna razmerja, pri katerih se zastavlja tako vprašanje, kdo od koga kondicira, kakor tudi, kaj je vsebina kondikcijskega zahtevka. Nejasno je tudi vprašanje konkurence različnih zahtevkov, zlasti med kondikcijskim in vindikacijskim. Na vsa ta vprašanja bo morala sodna praksa šele najti prepričljive odgovore.

When talking about the legal consequences of void contract, we mean those effects that arise independently of the intentions of the parties. The most important concern the contractual relationship reeling backwards to achieve the status quo ante, the situation that would have existed if the contract would not have been concluded. This process is supported by the claims (condictiones) that help the contract party who has already fully or partially fulfilled its contractual commitment. However, there are more questions than answers in this area. In the literature there is uncertainty about whether to apply the principle of reimbursement or enrichment. Even more difficult questions arise in multiparty relationships, among others, which party has a claim (condictio), as well as what is the content of his claim. Also unclear is the issue of competition of various actions, especially among condictiones and rei vindicatio. On all these questions our jurisprudence has yet to find convincing answers.

Legal Consequences of the Annulment of Contract: Certain Issues of Unjust Enrichment Claims