TFL Vsebine / Revija Poslovodno računovodstvo

Avtor v prispevku obravnava odgovornost za nezakonito odločanje izvršilne oblasti v t.i. nadzornih upravnih postopkih in za nezakonito odločanje sodne oblasti. Najprej opredli, kaj pomeni nezakonito odločanje in kdaj ga lahko opredelimo kot ravnanje, ki je podlaga za odškodninsko odgovornost, nato pa še, kdo odgovarja in pod kakšnimi pogoji. Posebno pozornost nameni vsebini in pomenu 26. člena Ustave, ki predstavlja ustavnopravno podlago pravice do povračila škode, kadar je ta povzročena posamezniku ali drugemu subjektu z opravljanjem službe ali kakšne druge dejavnosti državnega organa. V zvezi s tem se zastavlja tudi vprašanje ustavnosti zakonske ureditve, ki bi izključevala odškodninsko odgovornost za nezakonito ravnanje v okviru izvrševanja pristojnosti državnega organa. V besedilu prispevka so vključena tudi stališča ustavnosodne presoje, povezana z obravnavano temo.

The author deals with the responsibility for unlawful decision-making by the executive power in the so-called supervisory administrative procedures and for the illegal decision-making of the judicial authorities. First, define what is the meaning of unlawful decision-making and when it can be defined as an act that is the basis for liability for damages, and then, who is responsible for it and under what conditions. Special attention is paid to the content and the meaning of Article 26 of the Constitution, which contains the constitutional basis of the right to compensation for damage caused to an individual or other entity by performing a public service or some other activity of a state. In this regard, the question of the constitutionality of the legislation, which would exclude liability for unlawful conduct in the exercise of the authority of the state, is also raised. Paper also presents the views of the constitutional review related to the topic under discussion.