TFL Vsebine / Revija Pravnik

1

Avtor obravnava raziskovalno vprašanje, in sicer ali uresničevanje sodb ESČP v Sloveniji ne sme biti omejeno zgolj na konkretno (inter partes) izvrševanje dokončnih sodb ESČP, s katerimi je bila država obsojena, in ki poteka pod nadzorom Odbora ministrov, temveč mora pomeniti prek načela res interpretata širši zavezujoči pravni pristop, ki je namenjen zagotovitvi spoštovanja človekovih pravic tudi posameznikom v drugih podobnih primerih v postopkih pred slovenskimi organi. Avtor ugotavlja, da je obveznost upoštevanja razlage človekovih pravic iz EKČP, ki jo poda skozi svojo celotno sodno prakso ESČP, v Sloveniji za vse državne organe pravno zavezujoča. Ta obveznost pa je utemeljena tako na določbah EKČP in sodni praksi ESČP kot tudi na določbah Ustave Republike Slovenije in ustavnosodni praksi Ustavnega sodišča.

The author discusses the research issue, i.e., if the implementation of ECtHR judgments in Slovenia should not be limited only to concrete (inter partes) enforcement of final ECtHR judgments in which the state was convicted and that takes place under the supervision of the Committee of Ministers. Shouldn’t we be discussing a broader binding legal approach intended to ensure respect for human rights of individuals in other similar cases in proceedings before the Slovenian authorities? The author concludes that the obligation to take into account the ECtHR’s interpretation of human rights from the entire body of case-law is legally binding for all state bodies in Slovenia. This obligation of res interpretata originates firstly from the ECHR and case-law of the ECtHR and secondly from the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia and the constitutional case-law of the Constitutional Court.

Implementation of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in Slovenia Through the Res Interpretata Principle