TFL Vsebine / Revija Javna uprava

Prispevek z vidika stališč upravne teorije in sodne prakse sistematično analizira učinke, ki jih ima sprememba materialnega prava na odločanje v upravnem postopku, tako v primeru odločanja upravnih organov na prvi kot tudi na drugi stopnji. V prvem delu so predstavljeni argumenti in stališča glede časovne uporabe materialnega prava pri odločanju na prvi stopnji, v drugem delu pa so predstavljene različne možnosti glede uporabe materialnega prava pri odločanju o upravni zadevi po odpravi prvostopenjske odločbe v pritožbenem postopku in v primeru molka organa ter nekatera druga vprašanja, ki jih časovna uporaba materialnega prava odpira. Prispevek se sklene s sklepom, v katerem so predstavljena stališča avtorice glede obravnavane tematike.

From the perspective of administrative theory and case-law, the article systematically analyses the effects of changes in substantive law on the administrative decision-making process, both in case of administrative decision-making at first and second instance. First part presents arguments and points of view regarding the application of substantial law from the temporal perspective in the first instance of decision-making. The second part offers various options for the application of substantive law when administrative authorities are deciding the matter in cases where the firstinstance decision had been annulled in the appeal proceedings and in case of the silence of the authority. Some other questions, which the temporal application of substantive law opens, are also presented. The author concludes by adopting her own position regarding the topic under consideration.

Administrative Decision-Making in the Event of Some Changes in Substantive Law