TFL Vsebine / Revija Pravnik

9

Avtorja prikažeta temeljne argumente in doktrinarni prispevek novih meril samoogrožanja in zavržnih motivov na presojo krivde pri (naj)zavržnejših obnašanjih v cestnem prometu, ki jih je v svoji pravnomočni odločbi ustvarilo nemško Zvezno vrhovno sodišče (BGH). Na podlagi teh meril je potrebna argumentacija krivde v eventualni naklep (dolus eventualis): v obnašanju samoogrožanja in prevzemanja tveganja prometne nesreče zase se odraža storilčevo sprijaznjenje, vzetje v račun prometne nesreče in smrti drugih udeležencev v prometu kot posledice njegovega ravnanja. Zavržni motivi, ki je zlasti zmaga na protipredpisno organizirani cestni dirki, pa so drugi pol zavržnosti, na podlagi katerih sklepamo, da je storilec ravnal z eventualnim naklepom do smrti. Avtorja v prispevku prikažeta tudi teoretske poglede na izpolnitev zakonskih znakov umora v eventualnem naklepu, ki je tako v Nemčiji kot tudi v Sloveniji možen. Dotakneva se tudi težnje proti konstruiranju instituta malomarnostnega sostorilstva na primerih večosebnega sodelovanja pri protipredpisno organiziranih cestnih dirkah, ki vodijo v poškodbeno posledico pravnih dobrin. Narediva tudi kratki primerjalnopravni ekskurz v nemško glavno cestno- prometno kazensko zakonodajo in opozoriva na potencialne pomanjkljivosti slovenske ureditve tega prava.

Article presents the case of »Berlin drag race road accident«, in which the Federal Supreme Court of Germany (BGH) created a set of value decision bullet points on which a court should rely when valuing the most extreme negative behaviours in road traffic, especially in the field of mens rea. The core of the article presents arguments that require the court to construct legal intent (do- lus eventualis) with using the circumstances of exposure to self-risk of harm. When this self-hazardous behaviour results in damage to a criminal law good, the court should value the volitional component of dolus eventualis as proven. The other field that requires a construct of dolus eventualis is perpetrator’s motives for the act, in the case that they were considered as utterly discarding (hi- ghering ones self-worth through winning the illegal drag race) from the view of the court, the court should consider that the perpetrator acted with legal intent (dolus eventualis). In the article, the authors also research the problems of meeting qualifying circumstances that constitute murder with legal intent (dolus eventualis). There is also a small-scale comparative research in the field of road traffic criminal law between German and Slovenian road traffic criminal law. Slovenian Penal Code deficits in the field of road traffic criminal law are pointed out.

Exaggerated Reckless Disregard of Human Life in Road Traffic is Murder