Portal TFL
(Dia)logical Reconstruction of Legal Justification
O AVTORJU
Associate professor at the Institute of Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, University Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
AVTOR
Ana Dimiškovska
SOAVTOR
TIP DOKUMENTA
Strokovni članki
KLJUČNE BESEDE
KEYWORDS
legal argumentation, legal justification, dialogical modelling of judicial decisions, reason-based logic, Lodder’s DiaLaw, judge
NASLOV SEKCIJE
Argumentacijski modeli
SECTION
Models of Argumentation
PUBLIKACIJA
revija Revus
ŠTEVILKA PUBLIKACIJE ABS
19
LETO
2013
ZALOŽNIK
Klub Revus - Center za raziskovanje evropske Ustavnosti in demokracije
POVZETEK
SUMMARY
In this paper an attempt is made to apply the dialogical approach to modelling legal justification in a particular legal case and to present a dialogical reconstruction of a controversial judicial decision from the Macedonian legal context. The reconstruction is carried out using a contemporary dialogical model of legal justification: Arno Lodder’s DiaLaw. The dialogical approach on which this model is based is shown to be suitable for representing the argumentative dynamics and strategic elements of legal argumentation. However, there are still some open questions related to its use, especially concerning the normative status of dialogical rules and the possibility of modelling the role of the judge or arbiter in legal controversies.
TITLE
Za ogled celotnega dokumenta je potrebna prijava v portal.
Začnite z najboljšim.
VSE NA ENEM MESTU.