TFL Vsebine / Revija Revus

Pravni realizem Alfa Rossa in naturalizem. Filozofska rekonstrukcija. Članek naslavlja pomemben izziv skandinavskemu realizmu, ki izhaja iz razširjenega stališča, da temeljna filozofska izhodišča, na katerih to gibanje sloni, niso več sprejemljiva. Avtor se osredotoči na Rossovo različico skandinavskega realizma, ki je bila pogosto v središču različnih kritik, in trdi, da je z ustrezno filozofsko rekonstrukcijo ta teorija sposobna preživeti padec logičnega pozitivizma. Ob tem trdi, da je mogoče Rossovo realistično pravno teorijo praktično nedotaknjeno odvezati njenih zavez logičnemu pozitivizmu ter jo vdelati v alternativen, naturalistični filozofski program, ki je trenutno v filozofiji precej močno zastopan. V ta namen se avtor posluži ozkega Quineovega pojmovanja naturalizma – poznanega tudi kot nadomestni naturalizem – ki se sicer razlikuje od širšega vključujočega pojmovanja drugih pravoslovcev a hkrati pušča filozofsko krizo skandinavskega realizma nerazrešeno.

This article addresses a pertinent challenge to Scandinavian realism which follows from the widespread perception that the fundamental philosophical premises on which the movement relies, are no longer tenable. Focusing on Alf Ross’s version of Scandinavian realism which has often been at the centre of critical attention, the author argues that Ross’s theory can survive the fall of logical positivism through an exercise of philosophical reconstruction. More specifically, he claims that it is possible to dismount Ross’s realist legal theory almost intact from its commitments to logical positivism and embed it into an alternative naturalist philosophical program that is currently very strong in contemporary philosophy. In so doing, the author applies a narrow Quinean conception of naturalism, also known as replacement naturalism, which differs from a broader inclusive conception which has been applied by other scholars in the field but which leaves the philosophical crisis of Scandinavian realism unsolved.