TFL Vsebine / Revija Pravnik

5

Čeprav slovenska normativna ureditev upravnih pogodb ne pozna, se je ta institut pojavil tudi pri nas, sprva v teoretičnih razpravah, nato pa še v sodni praksi, ki se pri identifikaciji upravnih pogodb opira na pravno teorijo, ta pa izhaja iz francoske ureditve upravnih pogodb. V slovenskem pravnem redu tako obstajajo številne pogodbe, pri katerih lahko prepoznamo elemente upravnih pogodb, vendar se zaradi odsotnosti posebne javnopravne regulacije takih pogodb ali njihove pomanjkljive regulacije zanje uporabljajo pravila obligacijskega prava. Ta pravila pa niso prilagojena posebnostim takih pogodbenih razmerij, saj ne upoštevajo dejstva, da pri upravnih pogodbah javnopravni subjekt ne nastopa le kot pogodbena stranka, temveč predvsem kot oblast. Avtorica zato zagovarja stališče, da bi morali tudi pri nas institut upravnih pogodb urediti na normativni ravni.

Even though administrative contracts are not recognised in the Slovene regulatory framework, they have also appeared in this territory: firstly, only in theoretical discussions and later in courts’ case law, which identifies them by relying on legal theory that derives from the French regulation of the administrative contracts. Consequently, numerous contracts can be found in the Slovene legal system containing elements of administrative contracts. However, due to the absence of a special public law regulation or insufficient regulation of such contracts, the rules of obligation law are applicable to them. These rules, however, are not adapted to the specifics of such contractual relations, since they do not consider the fact that in administrative contracts a public- law entity does not act only as a contracting party, but above all as a power. Therefore, the author takes the position that the institute of administrative contracts should also be regulated at our normative level.

Administrative Contract as a Special Institute of Administrative Law – Where are We Now and How to Proceed?