TFL Vsebine / Zbornik znanstvenih razprav

V kazenskopravnih sistemih, ki temeljijo na dualizmu storilstva in udeležbe, je kaznivost udeležbe praviloma odvisna od dejanja, ki ga je izvršil (ali vsaj poskusil izvršiti) glavni storilec (akcesornost udeležbe). V prispevku so obravnavani različni vidiki akcesornosti (kvantitativna in kvalitativna akcesornost), še zlasti v tem trenutku aktualno vprašanje slovenskega kazenskega prava, ali naj bo za kaznivost udeleženca pogoj tudi naklepno dejanje glavnega storilca. Avtor tako omejitev kaznivosti udeležbe podpre in kritično analizira ureditev v slovenskem kazenskem zakoniku, ki je to vprašanje rešil neenotno (naklepno dejanje glavnega storilca kot pogoj za kaznivost pomoči, ne pa tudi napeljevanja). Sklepno je obravnavano tudi vprašanje upravičenosti odstopa od načela akcesornosti udeležbe v primeru kaznivosti neuspelega napeljevanja.

In penal systems based on the dualism of perpetration and participation, the punishability of participation generally depends on the crime perpetrated (or at least attempted) by the prime perpetrator (the accessorial nature of participation). The article deals with various aspects of accessoriness (the quantitative and qualitative accessoriness) and the currently topical question in Slovenian criminal law of whether the prime perpetrator’s intent should be regarded as a condition for punishability of the participators. The author supports such a limitation on the punishability of participation and critically analyses the regulation of this area in the Slovenian Criminal Code where the subject matter is not handled consistently (an intentionally committed act by the prime perpetrator is a condition for the punishability of aiding and abetting, but not for punishability of instigation). In the conclusion, the author discusses weather the deviation from the principle of the accessoriness of participation which is represented by the punishability of attempted instigation, is justified.