TFL Vsebine / Revija Pravnik

11

Upravni spor se razvija v smeri vse aktivnejše vloge upravnega sodišča pri ugotavljanju relevantnega dejanskega in pravnega stanja v zadevi. Kljub možnosti, da sodišče v upravnem sporu izvaja dokaze po uradni dolžnosti, je pretežni del aktivnosti za izvedbo dokazov na strankah postopka. Sodišče je dolžno podane dokazne predloge presoditi in sprejeti odločitev glede izvedbe posameznega dokaza. Prispevek obravnava presojo dokaznih predlogov v upravnem sporu. Avtorici se najprej opredeljujeta do pomena in uresničevanja pravice do dokaza ter s tem povezane porazdelitve trditvenega in dokaznega bremena v upravnem sporu. Nato se s teoretičnega in praktičnega vidika osredotočata na presojo dokaznih predlogov v upravnem sporu in pri tem ločujeta formalna in materialna merila presoje dopustnosti dokaznih predlogov. Prispevek analizira tudi uporabo dokazov, ki so bili pridobljeni s kršitvijo človekovih pravic in svoboščin, preučuje presojo dokaznih predlogov pri odločanju o izdaji začasne odredbe ter razčlenjuje standarde obrazložitve zavrnitve dokaznih predlogov.

Administrative dispute is evolving towards a more proactive role for the administrative court in determining the relevant facts and legal basis of the case. Despite the possibility for the court to take evidence ex officio in administrative dispute, the bulk of the activity of taking evidence rests with the parties to the proceedings. It is for the court to assess the evidence presented and to decide on the admissibility of specific pieces of evidence. This article deals with the assessment of motions for evidence in administrative dispute. It first discusses the meaning and exercise of the right to evidence and the related distribution of the burden of proof in administrative dispute. It then focuses, from a theoretical and practical perspective, on the assessment of submitted evidence in administrative dispute, distinguishing between formal and substantive criteria for assessing the admissibility of submitted evidence. The article also analyses the use of evidence obtained in violation of human rights and freedoms, examines the assessment of evidence in the context of the decision to issue an interim injunction, and analyses the standards of reasoning applied in the dismissal of evidence.

Assessment of Proposed Evidence in an Administrative Dispute