TFL Vsebine / Revija Pravnik

9

Uvodnik ponuja razmislek o poslanstvu prava in o tem, kako pravo doživlja posameznik ob začetku kariere ter pozneje ob različnih poklicnih izkušnjah in preizkušnjah. Avtor piše o svoji izkušnji v politiki, ki mu je pogled na pravo spremenila in ga oddaljila od začetne idealistične naivnosti. Spregovori o primeru arbitražne razsodbe med Slovenijo in Hrvaško ter političnih okoliščinah, ki vplivajo na usodo primera. Pri tem poudarja, da se z umikanjem pravnih argumentov pred političnimi, včasih celo ideološkimi, bližamo nevarni točki, ko argumentiran pogovor o tem vprašanju sploh ne bo več mogoč. A zaradi vladavine prava in moči pravice moramo vztrajati, zaključi.

The editorial offers a reflection on the purpose of the law and the difference between how it is experienced by the individual at the beginning of one’s career and later on when a person is faced with different professional experiences. The author writes about his experience in politics, which changed his view of law and distanced him from his initial idealistic naivety. He focuses on the case of the arbitration ruling between Slovenia and Croatia and the political circumstances that affect the fate of the case. In this regard, he emphasizes that when legal arguments are being challenged by political, sometimes even ideological arguments, we approach a dangerous point when an argumentative and reasoned discussion on this issue is no longer possible. However, as jurists we have to insist in the name of the rule of law and the justice, he concludes.

Persistence of Us, Who Transfer the Mission of Law