TFL Vsebine / Revija SIR*IUS

The problems of reviewing the appraisal reports on courts

V prispevku je obdelanih nekaj vprašanj, ki se nanašajo na način vključevanja ocenjevalcev vrednosti podjetij ali premoženja v sodne postopke. Razlikovati je treba med položajem, ko navedene strokovnjake med sodnim postopkom za pomoč zaprosijo posamezne stranke sodnega postopka, ko jih v sodni postopek pritegne sodišče kot postavljene cenilce, da izdelajo ustrezno mnenje o gospodarskih lastnostih stvari ali njeni vrednosti. Takšna strokovna oseba bo opravila nalogo tako, da bo sodniku in strankam postopka na razumljiv način podala bistveno informacijo o predmetu vrednotenja. V nasprotnem primeru bo cenilec moral svoje delo ustrezno dopolniti, pri neodpravljivih pomanjkljivostih pa bo sodišče moralo vključiti drugega strokovnjaka. Za opravljeno delo pa tako zaposlenemu strokovnjaku pripadata tudi ustrezna nagrada in pravica do povrnitve potrebnih stroškov.

This article deals with some questions concerning the mode of involving business or property appraisers in litigations. There is a difference between cases in which the abovementioned experts are asked by an individual party to participate in the litigation and cases when experts are summoned by the court as appraisers with the assignment to present a proper opinion about economic characteristics of things or their values. Such an expert will complete his assignment by giving the judge and the parties an understandable and substantial information about the subject of valuation. Should this not be the case, the appraiser will have to complement his valuation appropriately or, if deficiencies cannot be remedied, the court will have to appoint another expert. The expert is entitled to an adequate remuneration for the work performed as well to the reimbursement of the necessary expenses.