TFL Vsebine / Pravni letopis

Prispevek obravnava pogled sodnika, ki odloča v gospodarskih sporih, insolvenčnih, nepravdnih in drugih gospodarskih postopkih ter mora pri svojem delu uporabiti več zakonov, na nomotehniko. Med vsemi pomembnimi načeli za pripravo predpisov, ki so določena v Resoluciji o normativni dejavnosti (ReNDej), je posebej poudarjeno načelo določnosti. Sodnik največkrat naleti na težavo, če nomotehnično niso usklajeni enaki pojmi v različnih pravnih besedilih. Pojasnjeno je, da mora sodnik v posamezni zadevi uporabiti več predpisov, ki se lahko medsebojno prepletajo in dopolnjujejo. Sodnikova naloga je, da vsak predpis razlaga ustavnopravno skladno. Predstavljeni so tudi pojmi nujne zadeve v insolvenčnih postopkih, kdaj je treba v postopku sodnega registra in pri začasni odredbi odločati hitro ter o katerih vrstah zadev odloča sodišče prednostno. Obravnavano je tudi razreševanje pravnih položajev, urejenih v različnih predpisih, ki različno urejajo ista ali primerljiva pravna dejstva ali razmerja. Opozorjeno je na razmerje med neposredno zahtevo podjemnikovih sodelavcev do naročnika po 631. členu Obligacijskega zakonika in razmerji s podizvajalci pri javnih naročilih po Zakonu o javnem naročanju. Poudarjeno je, da avtentična razlaga za sodišče ni zavezujoča. Posebna previdnost zakonodajalca pri spremembah zakona je potrebna, ko ta vpliva na pravni promet v stečajnih postopkih. Na koncu prispevka je poudarjeno, da mora različne pojme v zakonu (ZGD-1 in ZFPPIPP), ki bi morali biti v različnih predpisih uporabljeni za enak položaj enako, pravilno razložiti sodna praksa.

The article deals with the view of the judge who decides in commercial disputes, insolvent, non-litigation and other economic proceedings on nomotechnics and must apply several laws in his work. Among all the important principles for drafting the rules set out in the Resolution on regulatory activity (ReNDej), the principle of certainty is particularly emphasized. The judge most often encounters a problem if the same concepts are not harmonized nomotechnically in different legal texts. It is clarified that the judge in a particular case must apply several rules that can be intertwined and complementary. It is the judge’s job to interpret each regulation constitutionally in accordance with the law. The concepts of urgent cases in insolvency proceedings are also presented, when it is necessary to decide quickly in the proceedings of the court register and in the interim order and which types of cases are decided by the court as a matter of priority. The resolution of legal situations regulated by different regulations that differently regulate the same or comparable legal facts or relationships is also discussed. The relationship between the direct request of the contractor’s associates to the contracting authority under Article 631 of the Obligations Code and the relations with subcontractors in public procurement under the Public Procurement Act are pointed out. It is emphasized that an authentic interpretation is not binding on the court. Special care should be taken by the legislator to amend the law when it affects legal transactions in bankruptcy proceedings. At the end of the paper, it is emphasized that the different terms in the law (ZGD-1 and ZFPPIPP), which should be used equally in different regulations for the same position, should be properly explained by the case law.

Nomotech in Commercial Law – Practical View