POVZETEK
Prispevek obravnava vpliv novele E Zakona o pravdnem postopku na položaj odvetnika v
pravdi. Spremembe postopka priprave za glavno obravnavo so analizirane pod predpostavko,
da je predvidljivost poteka postopka ključna za odvetniško delo. Avtor ugotavlja, da cilj novele
ni bil dosežen, vendarle pa bi novela lahko imela večji praktični učinek, če bi bil namen njenih
določb dosledneje spoštovan. Prispevek obravnava tudi nekatere spremembe instituta vročanja in novosti, usmerjene v izboljšanje položaja strank glede postavljanja zahtevkov in dokazovanja. Sklepni del podaja kratko analizo glavnih sprememb v postopkih s pravnimi sredstvi.
SUMMARY
The article considers the effect of amendment E of the Civil Procedure Act on the position of
the party’s counsel in a litigation. The amendments to trial preparation are analysed under the
assumption that it is the predictability of the process that is key for counsel work. The author
finds that the amendment failed to reach this goal, but a greater practical effect of the amendment could nevertheless be achieved should the purpose of its provisions be more consistently
honoured. The article also considers certain changes regarding the service of documents and
the novelties aimed at improving the parties’ position regarding the making of claims and
presenting of evidence. It concludes with a brief analysis of the changes in the legal remedies
procedures.
TITLE
Effect of amendment E of the Slovenian Civil Procedure Act on the position
of party’s counsel
Za ogled celotnega dokumenta je potrebna prijava v portal.
Začnite z najboljšim.
VSE NA ENEM MESTU.