TFL Vsebine / Zbornik znanstvenih razprav

Avtor v prvem delu razprave opredeljuje pojem eksegeze v obdobju recepcije in ga sooča z eksegezo v pomenu metode romanistike kot pravnozgodovinske vede, ki želi z razlago rimskopravnih virov priti do spoznanja, kakšno je rimsko pravo dejansko bilo in kako se je razvijalo v svoji tisočletni zgodovini. Nato opozarja, da omenjena dihotomija ni absolutna. V sodobnih sodnih odločbah in drugih sodnih dokumentih namreč srečujemo latinske citate oziroma sklicevanje na romanistično literaturo in celo neposredno navajanje odlomkov iz Justinijanovih Digest. Čeprav gre v mnogih primerih tovrstne de facto »uporabe« rimskega prava za ustaljene principe, ki so v sodobno pravo prešli zahvaljujoč recepciji, avtor meni, da bi danes eksegeza lahko zopet pridobila nekaj praktične veljave. S tega vidika bi rimsko pravo olajšalo tudi poenotenje evropskega prava. V drugem delu razprave je kot primer eksegeze predstavljen odlomek klasičnega jurista Celza (D. 6. 1. 38), ki obravnava pravne posledice gradnje oziroma setve na tujem zemljišču. Na njeni podlagi avtor kritično ovrednoti sodobno ureditev.

In the first part of the discussion the author defines the notion of exegesis during the period of reception and confronts it with exegesis as a method of legal history science intending to discover what Roman law actually used to be like and how it then developed in its thousand-year history. The author emphasises that the mentioned dichotomy is not absolute. In contemporary judgements and other judicial documents one can find Latin quotations or cross-references to Roman law literature or even a direct quotation of Justinian’s Digest. Even though many of such de facto »applications« of Roman law may count as settled principles that passed over into modern law due to reception, the author believes that exegesis could today again acquire some practical influence. Seen from this perspective, Roman law would also make the unification of European law easier. In the second part of the discussion the exegesis of a fragment by the classical jurist Celsus (D. 6, 1, 38) is presented, which deals with the legal consequences of building or planting on land belonging to another person. Most of the Roman law ideas from Celsus’ fragment can also be found in contemporary Slovenian law, which is critically dealt with in the last part of the discussion.