Portal TFL
Conceptual analysis and the Coercion Thesis
O AVTORJU
Emeritus Professor, The Australian National University, School of Philosophy
AVTOR
Frank Jackson
SOAVTOR
TIP DOKUMENTA
Strokovni članki
KLJUČNE BESEDE
coercion thesis, modest versus immodest conceptual analysis
KEYWORDS
NASLOV SEKCIJE
Symposium on law and coercion
SECTION
PUBLIKACIJA
Revija Revus
ŠTEVILKA PUBLIKACIJE ABS
45
LETO
2021
ZALOŽNIK
Klub Revus - Center za raziskovanje evropske Ustavnosti in demokracije
POVZETEK
In chapter two of Coercion and the Nature of Law, Kenneth Himma sets his defence of the Coercion Thesis – the thesis that it is a conceptual truth, and not merely a practical necessity, that a legal system contains sanctions – within an account of the nature of conceptual analysis. I discuss his account, and the nature of conceptual analysis more widely, explaining why I follow Himma in accepting the Coercion Thesis. I conclude with a short discussion of where I think he misunderstands the distinction between modest conceptual and immodest conceptual analysis.
SUMMARY
TITLE
Za ogled celotnega dokumenta je potrebna prijava v portal.
Začnite z najboljšim.
VSE NA ENEM MESTU.