TFL Vsebine / Revija Javna uprava

Upravni spor predstavlja neodvisen nadzor sodne veje oblasti nad upravno- pravnim delovanjem, v okviru katerega sodišče presoja zakonitost sprejetih odločitev uprave. Pri tem je pomembno, da lahko sodišče presoja ne le pravna, temveč tudi dejanska vprašanja, in da glede tega lahko samo ugotavlja dejstva in okoliščine, izvaja in ocenjuje dokaze ter samo odloči o posameznikovi pravici, obveznosti ali pravni koristi. Tako je prav pooblastilo sodišča za odločanje v sporu polne jurisdikcije pomembno za zagotavljanje polnega sodnega nadzora nad upravo, varstva posameznikovega pravnega položaja pred oblastnim delovanjem izvršilne (upravne) veje oblasti in nenazadnje učinkovitega reševanja upravnih zadev. Prispevek obravnava upravni spor polne jurisdikcije glede na pogoje, ki morajo biti izpolnjeni za tak način odločanja. V tem okviru je poudarjeno še odločanje v upravnem sporu po opravljeni glavni obravnavi, v primerjavi s sprejemanjem odločitev na seji. Pri tem se avtorica osredotoča na izvedbo glavne obravnave in na njen pomen pri uporabi reformatoričnega pooblastila v upravnem sporu.

Administrative dispute is an independent control of the judicial branch over administrative acts in which the court reviews the legality of the decisions taken by the administration. In this respect, it is important that the court has jurisdiction to assess issues of law and fact and in this regard to determine facts and circumstances, to assess and interpret evidence, and also to rule on an individual’s right, obligation, or legal interest. Thus, the court’s power for deciding in a dispute of full jurisdiction is important for ensuring full judicial review of the administration, protecting legal position of the individual against authoritative decisions of the executive (administrative) branch and, last but not least, effective resolving of administrative matters. The article deals with the administrative dispute of full jurisdiction with regard to the conditions, which must be satisfied for such decision-making process. In this context, the emphasis is on administrative dispute with the main hearing, compared to the trial at a session. The focus is on the main hearing and its importance in the application of the court’s reformative power in the administrative dispute.

The Importance of the Main Hearing in the Administrative Dispute of Full Jurisdiction