Portal TFL
Arbitrability of Concession Disputes. Digest of the Case Law of the Ljubljana Arbitration Centre and the Slovenian Courts
O AVTORJU
Marko Djinović: LL.B., MSc, Secretary General of the Ljubljana Arbitration Centre and member of the ICC Commission on Arbitration and ADR. E-mail: marko.djinovic@gzs.si. Peter Rižnik: LL.B., Konrad & Partners (Vienna, Austria), External Advisor to the Ljubljana Arbitration Centre and member of the ICC Commission on Arbitration and ADR. E-mail: p.riznik@konrad-partners.com.
AVTOR
Marko Djinović in Peter Rižnik
TIP DOKUMENTA
Znanstveno-strokovni članki
IZDAJATELJ
Inštitut za javno upravo pri Pravni fakulteti v Ljubljani
KLJUČNE BESEDE
Arbitraža; arbitrabilnost; koncesijska pogodba; koncesijski spori; avtentična razlaga zakona; gospodarske javne službe, ZGJS, Stalna arbitraža pri GZS.
KEYWORDS
Arbitration; Arbitrability; Concession contract, Concession Dispute; Authentic Interpretation; Services of General Economic Interest Act; ZGJS; Ljubljana Arbitration Centre.
PUBLIKACIJA
Revija Javna uprava
POVZETEK
Prispevek obravnava pojem in meje arbitrabilnosti v Republiki Sloveniji na splošno, posebej pa arbitrabilnost koncesijskih sporov v luči sporne avtentične razlage 40. člena Zakona o gospodarskih javnih službah (ZGJS), ki je bila sprejeta leta 2011 in je vnesla nemalo zmede predvsem na strani oseb javnega prava (koncedentov) kot strank arbitražnih postopkov ter prestrašila potencialne domače in tuje investitorje (koncesionarje). Prispevek proučuje ozadje sprejema avtentične razlage 40. člena ZGJS in razloge za njeno pravno neučinkovitost v praksi. Dodana vrednost prispevka je analiza arbitražne prakse Stalne arbitraže pri Gospodarski zbornici Slovenije in slovenske sodne prakse, ki sta se v zadnjih petih letih izoblikovali v zvezi s sporno avtentično razlago. Analizirana arbitražna in sodna praksa, vključno s prelomno odločitvijo Vrhovnega sodišča RS Cpg 2/2014 z dne 17. junija 2014 enotno priznava arbitrabilnost koncesijskih sporov v Republiki Sloveniji.
SUMMARY
The article deals with the definition of and limitations to arbitrability in the Republic of Slovenia in general, and limitations to arbitrability of concession disputes in particular, focusing on the contested authentic interpretation of Article 40 of the Services of General Economic Interest Act (ZGJS). The interpretation was adopted by the Slovenian Parliament in 2011 and caused significant confusion, particularly to public law bodies (grantors of concession) as parties to arbitration proceedings, as well as dissuaded potential domestic and foreign investors (concessionaires). This article examines the reasons behind the authentic interpretation and its lack of legal effect. The added value of the article lies in the analysis of the case law of tribunals at the Ljubljana Arbitration Centre (LAC) as well as the Slovenian judiciary, established since the adoption of the authentic interpretation in 2011 concerning the contested authentic interpretation. All of the case law, including that of the Supreme Court (No. Cpg 2/2014 of 17 June 2014), recognizes the arbitrability of concession disputes in a uniform manner.
TITLE
Arbitrability of Concession Disputes. Digest of the CaseLaw of the Ljubljana Arbitration Centre and the Slovenian Courts
Za ogled celotnega dokumenta je potrebna prijava v portal.
Začnite z najboljšim.
VSE NA ENEM MESTU.