CONCLUSIONS
Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 13+10-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general};Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)
DOCUMENT TYPE NPR. JUDGMENT (MERITS AND JUST SATISFACTION)
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
ORIGINATING BODY NPR.
COURT (FIFTH SECTION)
Court (Third Section Committee)
APP. NO(S). NPR. 35726/10
5804/15, 48932/19, 4099/20, 4945/20, 11619/20, 13442/20, 41853/23, 17835/24, 24650/24