Uredba o ratifikaciji Sklepa št. 1/2000 Skupnega odbora po Sporazumu o prosti trgovini med Republiko Slovenijo in Republiko Estonijo o spremembah Protokola 2 o opredelitvi pojma "izdelki s poreklom" in načinih upravnega sodelovanja k Sporazumu o prosti trgovini med Republiko Slovenijo in Republiko Estonijo

OBJAVLJENO V: Uradni list RS (mednarodne) 11-38/2002, stran 488 DATUM OBJAVE: 26.4.2002

RS (mednarodne) 11-38/2002

38. Uredba o ratifikaciji Sklepa št. 1/2000 Skupnega odbora po Sporazumu o prosti trgovini med Republiko Slovenijo in Republiko Estonijo o spremembah Protokola 2 o opredelitvi pojma “izdelki s poreklom“ in načinih upravnega sodelovanja k Sporazumu o prosti trgovini med Republiko Slovenijo in Republiko Estonijo
Na podlagi 3. alinee petega odstavka 75. člena Zakona o zunanjih zadevah (Uradni list RS, št. 45/01) izdaja Vlada Republike Slovenije
U R E D B O
O RATIFIKACIJI SKLEPA ŠT. 1/2000 SKUPNEGA ODBORA PO SPORAZUMU O PROSTI TRGOVINI MED REPUBLIKO SLOVENIJO IN REPUBLIKO ESTONIJO O SPREMEMBAH PROTOKOLA 2     O OPREDELITVI POJMA “IZDELKI S POREKLOM“ IN NAČINIH UPRAVNEGA SODELOVANJA     K SPORAZUMU O PROSTI TRGOVINI MED REPUBLIKO SLOVENIJO IN REPUBLIKO ESTONIJO

1. člen

Ratificira se Sklep št. 1/2000 Skupnega odbora po Sporazumu o prosti trgovini med Republiko Slovenijo in Republiko Estonijo o spremembah Protokola 2 o opredelitvi pojma “izdelki s poreklom“ in načinih upravnega sodelovanja k Sporazumu o prosti trgovini med Republiko Slovenijo in Republiko Estonijo, ki je bil podpisan v Ljubljani 27. decembra 2000.

2. člen

Sklep se v izvirniku v angleškem jeziku in prevodu glasi:
DECISION No. 1/2000
OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE OF THE FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA AND     THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA ON AMENDMENTS OF THE PROTOCOL 2 ON THE DEFINITION OF “ORIGINATING     PRODUCTS“ AND METHODS OF     ADMINISTRATIVE COOPERATION TO THE FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA AND THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA

THE JOINT COMMITTEE
    Having regard to the Free Trade Agreement between the Republic of Slovenia (hereinafter called Slovenia), of the one part, and the Republic of Estonia (hereinafter called Estonia), of the other part, signed in Tallinn on 26 November 1996, and in particular Article 40 thereof;
    Whereas some technical amendments are in order to correct the text;
    Whereas the list of insufficient working and processing needs to be amended to ensure proper interpretation and to take account of the need to include some operations not covered previously by this list;
    Whereas the provisions for the temporary use of flat rates in cases where drawback is prohibited of exemptions from Customs duties are granted need to be prolonged until 31 December 2001;
    Whereas the need has arisen to provide for a system of accounting segregation of originating and non-originating materials, subject to authorization by Customs authorities;
    Whereas the provisions concerning the amounts expressed in Euro need to be revised in order to clarify the procedure and to provide greater stability for the level of the amounts in national currencies;
    Whereas to take account of the lack of production of certain material within the countries concerned, a correction must be made to the list of working and processing requirements which non-originating materials have to fulfil to qualify for originating status
    HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Protocol 2 on the definition of the concept of “originating products“ and methods of administrative cooperation is hereby amended as follows:
    1. Article 1 (i) shall be replaced by:

“(i) ‘added value’ shall be taken to be the ex-works price minus the customs value of each of the materials incorporated which originate in the other countries referred to in Articles 3 and 4 or, where the customs value is not known or cannot be ascertained, the first verifiable price paid for the materials in Slovenia or Estonia. “

2. Article 7 shall be replaced by:

“Article 7

Insufficient working or processing

1. Without prejudice to paragraph 2, the following operations shall be considered as insufficient working or processing to confer the status of originating products, whether or not the requirements of Article 6 are satisfied:
    (a) preserving operations to ensure that the products remain in good condition during transport and storage;
    (b) breaking-up and assembly of packages;
    (c) washing, cleaning; removal of dust, oxide, oil, paint or other coverings;
    (d) ironing or pressing of textiles;
    (e) simple painting and polishing operations;
    (f) husking, partial or total bleaching, polishing, and glazing of cereals and rice;
    (g) operations to colour sugar or form sugar lumps;
    (h) peeling, stoning and shelling, of fruits, nuts and vegetables;
    (i) sharpening, simple grinding or simple cutting;
    (j) sifting, screening, sorting, classifying, grading, matching; (including the making-up of sets of articles);
    (k) simple placing in bottles, cans, flasks, bags, cases, boxes, fixing on cards or boards and all other simple packaging operations;
    (l) affixing or printing marks, labels, logos and other like distinguishing signs on products or their packaging;
    (m) simple mixing of products, whether or not of different kinds;
    (n) simple assembly of parts of articles to constitute a complete article or disassembly of products into parts;
    (o) a combination of two or more operations specified in subparagraphs (a) to (n);
    (p) slaughter of animals.
    2. All operations carried out either in Slovenia or in Estonia on a given product shall be considered together when determining whether the working or processing undergone by that product is to be regarded as insufficient within the meaning of paragraph 1.“
    3. In Article 15, the final sentence in paragraph 6 shall be replaced by:

“The provisions of this paragraph shall apply until 31 December 2001.“

4. The following article shall be inserted after Article 20 and a reference to this article shall be added in the Table of Contents:

“Article 20a

Accounting segregation

1. Where considerable cost or material difficulties arise in keeping separate stocks of originating and non-originating materials which are identical and interchangeable, the customs authorities may, at the written request of those concerned, authorise the so-called “accounting segregation“ method to be used for managing such stocks.
    2. This method must be able to ensure that, for a specific reference-period, the number of products obtained which could be considered as originating is the same as that which would have been obtained if there had been physical segregation of the stocks.
    3. The customs authorities may grant such authorisation, subject to any conditions deemed appropriate.
    4. This method is recorded and applied on the basis of the general accounting principles applicable in the country where the product was manufactured.
    5. The beneficiary of this facilitation may issue or apply for proofs of origin, as the case may be, for the quantity of products which may be considered as originating. At the request of the customs authorities, the beneficiary shall provide a statement of how the quantities have been managed.
    6. The customs authorities shall monitor the use made of the authorisation and may withdraw it at any time whenever the beneficiary makes improper use of the authorisation in any manner whatsoever or fails to fulfil any of the other conditions laid down in this Protocol.“
    5. In Article 22, paragraph 1, first sentence, the following shall be inserted after “exporter“:

“hereinafter referred to as “approved exporter”,“

6. Article 30 shall be replaced by:

“Article 30

Amounts expressed in Euro

1. For the application of the provisions of Article 21.1(b) and Article 26.3 in cases where products are invoiced in a currency other than Euro, amounts in the national currencies of the countries referred to in Articles 3 and 4 equivalent to the amounts expressed in Euro shall be fixed annually by each of the countries concerned.
    2. A consignment shall benefit from the provisions of Article 21.1(b) or Article 26.3 by reference to the currency in which the invoice is drawn up, according to the amount fixed by the country concerned.
    3. The amounts to be used in any given national currency shall be the equivalent in that currency of the amounts expressed in Euro as at the first working day of October and shall apply from 1 January the following year. Slovenia and Estonia shall be notified of the relevant amounts.
    4. A country may round up or down the amount resulting from the conversion into its national currency of an amount expressed in Euro. The rounded-off amount may not differ from the amount resulting from the conversion by more than 5 per cent. A country may retain unchanged its national currency equivalent of an amount expressed in Euro if, at the time of the annual adjustment provided for in paragraph 3, the conversion of that amount, prior to any rounding-off, results in an increase of less that 15 per cent in the national currency equivalent. The national currency equivalent may be retained unchanged if the conversion would result in a decrease in that equivalent value.
    5. The amounts expressed in Euro shall be reviewed by the Joint Committee at the request of Slovenia or Estonia. When carrying out this review, the Joint Committee shall consider the desirability of preserving the effects of the limits concerned in real terms. For this purpose, it may decide to modify the amounts expressed in Euro.“
    7. Annex II shall be amended as follows:
    a) the entry for HS heading 5309 to 5311 shall be replaced by:

&fbco;binary entityId="fbfd0e23-3d65-4a74-b6c1-55daada52c49" type="gif"&fbcc;
 

b) the entry for HS heading 5602 shall be replaced by:

&fbco;binary entityId="55677c01-36b1-479d-a56e-0f39405bc40f" type="gif"&fbcc;
 

c) the entry for Chapter 57 shall be replaced by:


  &fbco;binary entityId="9a18b4d4-5244-46f1-b946-0e0f8680f521" type="gif"&fbcc;

Article 2

1. This Decision shall be approved in accordance with the internal legal requirements of Estonia and Slovenia and it shall enter into force on the date of exchange of diplomatic notes.
    2. If this Decision cannot enter into force in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, it shall be applied provisionally from January 1, 2001.
    Done at Ljubljana this 27th day of December 2000 in two authentic copies in the English language.

For the Republic of Slovenia
    Renata Vitez (s)
    For the Republic of Estonia
    Mait Martinson (s)

SKLEP ŠT. 1/2000
SKUPNEGA ODBORA PO SPORAZUMU     O PROSTI TRGOVINI MED REPUBLIKO SLOVENIJO     IN REPUBLIKO ESTONIJO O SPREMEMBAH PROTOKOLA 2 O OPREDELITVI POJMA “IZDELKI S POREKLOM“ IN NAČINIH UPRAVNEGA SODELOVANJA     K SPORAZUMU O PROSTI TRGOVINI     MED REPUBLIKO SLOVENIJO     IN REPUBLIKO ESTONIJO
SKUPNI ODBOR JE
ob upoštevanju sporazuma o prosti trgovini med Republiko Slovenijo (v nadaljevanju Slovenija) na eni strani in Republiko Estonijo (v nadaljevanju Estonija) na drugi strani, podpisanega v Talinu 26. novembra 1996, in še posebej njegovega 40. člena,
ker so potrebne nekatere tehnične spremembe zaradi popravka besedila,
ker je treba seznam nezadostnih postopkov obdelave in predelave spremeniti zato, da se zagotovi pravilna razlaga in da se upoštevajo potrebe po vključitvi nekaterih postopkov, ki prej niso bili vključeni v ta seznam,
ker je treba do 31. decembra 2001 podaljšati določbe o začasni uporabi pavšalnih dajatev za primere, ko je prepovedano povračilo plačane carine ali je odobrena opustitev plačila carine,
ker je nastala potreba po zagotovitvi sistema ločenega knjigovodskega izkazovanja materialov s poreklom in brez njega ob pogoju pridobitve dovoljenja carinskih organov,
ker je treba pregledati določbe v zvezi z zneski, izraženimi v evrih, zato da se pojasni postopek in zagotovi večja stabilnost višine zneskov v domačih valutah,
ker je treba ob upoštevanju pomanjkanja proizvodnje določenega materiala v teh državah popraviti seznam zahtevanih obdelav in predelav, ki jih je treba izpolniti za materiale brez porekla, da lahko dobijo status blaga s poreklom,
SKLENIL:

1. člen

Protokol 2 o opredelitvi pojma “izdelki s poreklom“ in načinih upravnega sodelovanja se spremeni, kot sledi:

1.

Točka i) 1. člena se nadomesti z:
“i) ‘dodana vrednost’ pomeni ceno izdelka franko tovarna, zmanjšano za carinsko vrednost vsakega vključenega materiala s poreklom iz drugih držav, omenjenih v 3. in 4. členu, ali če carinska vrednost ni znana ali se ne da ugotoviti, prvo preverljivo ceno, plačano za materiale v Sloveniji ali v Estoniji.“

2.

7. člen se nadomesti z:

"7. člen

Nezadostni postopki obdelave ali predelave
1. Brez vpliva na drugi odstavek se šteje, da so naslednji postopki obdelave ali predelave nezadostni, da bi izdelek pridobil status izdelka s poreklom, ne glede na to, ali je zadoščeno zahtevam iz 6. člena:

(a)

postopki za ohranitev blaga v dobrem stanju med prevozom in skladiščenjem;